fix(cursor-review): bump dead kimi-k2.5 model id to kimi-k2.7-code#21
Conversation
Cursor delisted kimi-k2.5 from its catalog. cursor-agent now exits non-zero with empty stdout for it, so both Kimi panel cells silently score as `empty` and the 4-lab panel has been running as 3. kimi-k2.7-code is the only Kimi model left in the catalog and returns output normally. The other three pins are still valid.
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou’ve reached a temporary PR review limit under our Fair Usage Limits Policy. Next review available in: 10 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Comment |
3 participants
ELI-5
Our PR-review bot asks four AI models to look at each change. One of them, Kimi, got renamed on Cursor's side, so it's been silently coming back blank — we've quietly been reviewing with three models instead of four. This swaps in the current Kimi model so all four vote again.
What changed
kimi-k2.5→kimi-k2.7-codein.github/workflows/cursor-review.yml..github/cursor-review/README.mdupdated to match.Why
cursor-agent --model kimi-k2.5now exits 1 with empty stdout and stderrCannot use this model: kimi-k2.5. The run step's|| trueswallows the exit code, soextract-findings.pysees empty stdout and scores the cellempty— indistinguishable from "the model ran and found nothing." Both Kimi cells (adversarial + edge-case) drop out on every run and show up asReviewers that did not contribute.kimi-k2.7-codeis the only Kimi model left in Cursor's catalog (verified live — it returns output normally). The other three pins —gpt-5.3-codex-xhigh,claude-opus-4-8-thinking-xhigh,gemini-3.1-pro— are all still current and unchanged.Follow-up
A separate change will make an unknown/delisted model id fail loud (a catalog preflight, or scoring the cell
errorinstead ofempty) so the next time Cursor rotates its catalog it surfaces immediately instead of quietly degrading the panel.🤖 Generated with Claude Code